Prior Year
State Tournament
Next Year
State Tournament
| Unpage Home | Vermont Main Page |
Prior Year State Tournament | 2004 | Next Year State Tournament |
| If you can provide 2004 district tournament results that are not listed on this page, please contact the Unpage. |
Vermont District 1 Tournament
District 1 is using a pool play format. Leagues are divided into two pools for round-robin competition, and then the top three teams in each pool advance to the double-elimination district finals.
Pool Competition Results:
(Pool 'A' Participants: Burlington, Colchester, Middlebury Area, Richmond Area, and Williston)
(Pool 'B' Participants: Charlotte, Mount Abraham, North Burlington, Shelburne, South Burlington, and Vergennes Area)
Pool 'A' Tournament
Middlebury Area 8, Richmond Area 5
Colchester 3, Richmond Area 1
Williston 9, Colchester 5
Burlington American 10, Middlebury Area 0 (4 innings)
Burlington American 7, Williston 3
Williston 8, Richmond Area 6
Burlington American 10, Colchester 0
Burlington American 9, Richmond 0
Colchester 5, Middlebury Area 4
Williston 8, Middlebury Area 4
Pool 'B' Tournament
Charlotte 7, Vergennes Area 0
Shelburne 8, Mount Abraham 3
South Burlington 3, Shelburne 0 (7 innings)
Mount Abraham 9, Charlotte 0
South Burlington 7, North Burlington 2
South Burlington 13, Mount Abraham 2
Shelburne 9, Vergennes Area 0
North Burlington 3, Charlotte 2
South Burlington 16, Charlotte 1
North Burlington 10, Shelburne 9
Mount Abraham 11, Vergennes Area 1
North Burlington 5, Vergennes Area 3
|
Pool 'A' Standings |
W |
L |
| Burlington American | 4 | 0 |
| Williston | 3 | 1 |
| Colchester | 2 | 2 |
| Middlebury Area | 1 | 3 |
| Richmond Area | 0 | 4 |
|
Pool 'B' Standings |
W |
L |
| South Burlington | 4 | 0 |
| North Burlington | 3 | 1 |
| Shelburne | 2 | 2 |
| Mount Abraham | 2 | 2 |
| Charlotte | 1 | 3 |
| Vergennes Area | 0 | 4 |
The top three teams in each pool advance to the district finals.
Ties are broken based on records in head-to-head competition among tied teams. If a clear winner cannot be determined from head-to-head results, the tie is broken by calculating the ratio of runs allowed to defensive innings played for all teams involved in the tie. The team with the lowest runs-per-defensive-inning ratio advances.
In the event of a tie involving three or more teams, once the initial tie is broken, the remaining tied teams are again compared on head-to-head record to determine if a clear winner can be identified. If no clear winner can be identified from head-to-head results among the remaining tied teams, the runs-per-defensive-inning ratio is again used. This process is repeated until all ties have been broken.
District 1 Finals
Host - North Burlington
At Schifilliti Park and Rosenbury Park
Championship Game at Schifilliti Park
Opening Round:
Colchester 4, North Burlington 2
Williston 4, Shelburne 2
Winner's Bracket Semifinals:
South Burlington 5, Colchester 4
Burlington American 11, Williston 0
Elimination Bracket Quarterfinals (six teams remain):
Williston 11, North Burlington 2 (elim.)
Colchester 10, Shelburne 5 (elim.)
Winner's Bracket Finals:
Burlington American 9, South Burlington 7
Elimination Bracket Semifinals (four teams remain):
Colchester 6, Williston 0 (elim.)
Elimination Bracket Finals (three teams remain):
Colchester 4, South Burlington 2 (elim.)
Championship Game:
Burlington American 5, Colchester 3 (TITLE)
Click here to return to the top of the page.
Vermont District 2 Tournament
Bennington and Connecticut Valley South reach the district finals by winning their respective area tournaments with undefeated records.
District 2 Finals
Best 2-of-3 Series:
Championship Game Host - Bennington
Host - Bennington
Bennington 4, Connecticut Valley South 0
Connecticut Valley South 2, Bennington 1
Connecticut Valley South 11, Bennington 1 (TITLE)
|
Essex Town Pool Standings |
W |
L |
| Essex Town | 4 | 0 |
| St. Albans | 3 | 1 |
| Swanton | 2 | 2 |
| Underhill | 1 | 3 |
| Georgia | 0 | 4 |
|
Milton Pool Standings |
W |
L |
| Essex Junction | 5 | 0 |
| Milton | 4 | 1 |
| Missisquoi | 2 | 3 |
| Jericho | 2 | 3 |
| YOGI | 1 | 4 |
| Fairfax | 1 | 4 |
Ties are broken based on records in head-to-head competition among tied teams. If a clear winner cannot be determined from head-to-head results, the tie is broken by calculating the ratio of runs allowed to defensive innings played for all teams involved in the tie. The team with the lowest runs-per-defensive-inning ratio advances.
In the event of a tie involving three or more teams, once the initial tie is broken, the remaining tied teams are again compared on head-to-head record to determine if a clear winner can be identified. If no clear winner can be identified from head-to-head results among the remaining tied teams, the runs-per-defensive-inning ratio is again used. This process is repeated until all ties have been broken.
District 3 Finals
Host - Essex
Opening Round:
Essex Junction 11, St. Albans 3
Essex Town 6, Milton 0
Winner's Bracket Finals:
Essex Junction 2, Essex Town 0
Elimination Bracket Semifinals (four teams remain):
Milton 5, St. Albans 3 (elim.)
Elimination Bracket Finals (three teams remain):
Essex Town d. Milton (elim.)
Championship Game:
Essex Junction 8, Essex Town 6 (TITLE)
Click here to return to the top of the page.
|
Eastern Pool Standings |
W |
L |
| Lyndonville | 3 | 1 |
| Danville/Hardwick Area | 3 | 1 |
| Lake Region | 2 | 2 |
| St. Johnsbury | 1 | 3 |
| Connecticut Valley North | 1 | 3 |
|
Western Pool Standings |
W |
L |
| Barre Community | 4 | 1 |
| Mad River Valley | 4 | 1 |
| Montpelier | 3 | 2 |
| Clyde Whittemore | 2 | 3 |
| Central Valley | 2 | 3 |
| Northfield | 0 | 5 |
Ties are broken based on records in head-to-head competition among tied teams. If a clear winner cannot be determined from head-to-head results, the tie is broken by calculating the ratio of runs allowed to defensive innings played for all teams involved in the tie. The team with the lowest runs-per-defensive-inning ratio advances.
In the event of a tie involving three or more teams, once the initial tie is broken, the remaining tied teams are again compared on head-to-head record to determine if a clear winner can be identified. If no clear winner can be identified from head-to-head results among the remaining tied teams, the runs-per-defensive-inning ratio is again used. This process is repeated until all ties have been broken.
District 4 Finals
Host - Barre Community
At Barre Town Little League Field; Spaulding High School
Opening Round:
Barre Community 6, Danville/Hardwick Area 0
Lyndonville 4, Mad River Valley 0
Winner's Bracket Finals:
Lyndonville 8, Barre Community 0
Elimination Bracket Semifinals (four teams remain):
Mad River Valley 11, Danville/Hardwick Area 2 (elim.)
Elimination Bracket Finals (three teams remain):
Barre Community 8, Mad River Valley 2 (elim.)
Championship Series:
Barre Community 5, Lyndonville 3
Lyndonville 6, Barre Community 5 (7 innings; TITLE)
Click here to return to the top of the page.
Prior Year State Tournament | Next Year State Tournament |